[PATCH 01/15] [POWERPC] TQM5200 DTS

Marian Balakowicz m8 at semihalf.com
Wed Oct 17 21:10:10 EST 2007


Grant Likely wrote:
>> +       memory {
>> +               device_type = "memory";
>> +               reg = <00000000 04000000>;      // 64MB
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       soc5200 at f0000000 {
> 
> I think we're moving to the convetion of naming these nodes
> "soc@<addr>" now.  (You can drop the 5200 for the node name)

Seems that this will not be painless, U-boot uses hardcoded
paths with 'soc5200', so the appropriate patch will be needed.
That may be ok for new boards but what do we do with lite5200,
where U-boot upgrade is not always an option?

m.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list