[PATCH v2 4/7] bestcomm: core bestcomm support for Freescale MPC5200

[Grant Likely]

On 10/14/07, Sven Luther <sven at powerlinux.fr> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 02:22:16PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Sven Luther <sven at powerlinux.fr> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:42:05PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > From: Sylvain Munaut <tnt at 246tNt.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds support for the core of the BestComm API
> > > > for the Freescale MPC5200(b). The BestComm engine is a
> > > > microcode-controlled / tasks-based DMA used by several
> > > > of the onchip devices.
> > > >
> > > > Setting up the tasks / memory allocation and all common
> > > > low level functions are handled by this patch.
> > > > The specifics details of each tasks and their microcode
> > > > are split-out in separate patches.
> > > >
> > > > This is not the official API, but a much cleaner one.
> > > > (hopefully)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt at 246tNt.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> > >
> > > Hi Grant, ...
> > >
> > > I am unsure if this is a regression with regard to Sylvain's patch, or
> > > somethign else, but it is no more possible to build bestcomm modular :
> >
> > Hmmm, interesting.  I'll try that out here this afternoon.
>
> Notice that domen said it was working, so it could have been a
> mismanipulation on my part, or some problem with the debian patches.
>
> The older patchset with 2.6.23-rc6 worked fine though, and making the
> main bestcomm module builtin solved the error messages. I did not spot
> anything obvious when looking at the code.

Yes, it is a regression.  There had been a change to the Makefile.
I've reverted it and it works fine now.  I'll repost v3 shortly.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195