[PATCH] PowerPC: Fix find_legacy_serial_ports on OPB.

Josh Boyer jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Oct 12 04:31:53 EST 2007


On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 21:26 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 11 October 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >>> Currently find_legacy_serial_ports() can find no serial ports on the OPB.
> >>> Thus no legacy boot console can be initialized. Just the early udbg console
> >>> works, which is initialized with udbg_init_44x_as1() on the UART's physical
> >>> address specified in kernel config. This happens because we look for ns16750
> >>> and higher serial devices only and expect opb node to have a device type
> >>> property. This patch makes it look for ns16550 compatible devices and use
> >>> of_device_is_compatible() for opb instead of checking device type.
> >>> Lack of legacy serial ports found causes problems for KGDB over serial.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak at ru.mvista.com>
> >> The patch would make sense if we were only dealing with flattened device
> >> tree systems at this point. Unfortunately, IBM is shipping hardware that
> >> encodes the serial port in exactly the way that find_legacy_serial_ports
> >> is looking for (parent->type == "opb", compatible = "ns16750" "ns16550"
> >> "ns16450" i8250").
> >>
> >> Changing the search for ns16750 to ns16550 should be fine, but unnecessary
> >> because AFAIK, all OPB serial imlpementations are actually ns16750 and
> >> should have that in the device tree as well.
> >>
> >> For the device type of the bus, please check for both compatible and
> >> type, so that it still works on machines that are missing the compatible
> >> property.
> > 
> > Wait, no.  We already had this discussion months ago when David was
> > working on the original Ebony port.  It was declared that legacy_serial
> > is not how serial should be done on 4xx and the serial_of driver was
> > supposed to be used instead.
> > 
> > Have we changed our stance on that?  If not, then perhaps KGDB should be
> > fixed to work with serial_of.
> 
> Actually I don't see any reason not to use legacy_serial stuff for early 
> console. We could split the kernel configured very early debug output, 
> which uses  PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_44x_PHYSLOW/PHYSHIGH (since it's really 
> dangerous) and early console things by using legacy serial. We could use 
>   early boot console without PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_44x.

That was exactly my thinking when this first came up.  I'd like to hear
David's opinion on it.

josh




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list