[PATCH] Use 1TB segments

[Will Schmidt]

On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 13:13 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Will Schmidt writes:
> 
> > I still need to test this code for performance issues, and this version
> > could still use some cosmetic touchups, so I dont think we want this to
> > go into a tree yet.  I am reposting this primarily to indicate the prior
> > version isnt quite right, and so Jon can rebase to this version.  :-)
> 
> The way we scan the ibm,processor-segment-sizes property could be
> nicer.  Where there any other cosmetic touchups you were thinking of,
> and if so what were they?  I didn't notice any leftover debugging
> printks or anything else that obviously needed cleaning up.

Correct..  nothing in the patch really *needs* to be cleaned up.  This
is mostly me being way more nit-picky than I need to be.  :-)   I don't
have any real issues with the patch (being candidate for) going into a
tree. 

The only obvious is the MMU_SEGSIZE_* #define's in mmu-hash64.h appear
to be duplicated.

The rest I can follow up on later, none of it affects the code outside
of #ifdef DEBUG's and it should be a separate patch anyway.   

Thanks,
-Will

> Paul.