[PATCH 2/3] [libata] pata_of_platform: OF-Platform PATA device driver
Anton Vorontsov
avorontsov at ru.mvista.com
Fri Nov 30 22:45:42 EST 2007
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:05:01PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >>>Remaining question: any preferred name for that property? pio-mode okay?
> >>>It's assuming that PIO6 capable bus supports PIO0 as well, thus no mask.
>
> >> I've already suggested "generic". A name "simple" also comes to my mind.
>
> >You've misread my question. I didn't ask about driver name, but pio-mode
> >property.
>
> I'm OK with "pio-mode" then. Just don't think it makes much sense in the
> context of this driver which has no provision for the programming the mode
> timings (and if there were some provision, the *generic* platform driver
> couldn't handle it anyway).
What sense it makes then?.. We're specifying bus limitations wrt
PIO modes.
Oh, I think you meant that bus can't be reconfigured by generic
driver, that's true. But I didn't mean this as a purpose for
pio-mode property (though it still could be used for that
purpose by other drivers).
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou at mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou at yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list