[PATCH v2]: Fix e500 v2 core reboot bug

[Kumar Gala]

>>>>> I'm not terrible happy with blindly writing to rstcr.
>>>>>
>>>> I can understand you.
>>>> But I jut want to make things simple and workable.
>>>> Any idea?
>>>
>>> one idea would be for us to add a property on the soc node.
>>> Something like has-rstcr or something similar in a guts node?
>> I have seen your suggestion before to add a property in device tree.
>> But I still think the current implementation is simple.
>
> While it simple you are depending on the fact that a given
> implementation may or may not have something at the particular
> offset.  Who knows if 8599 or some future part could put the 'cause
> my part to smoke and self-destruct' at the same offset in the  
> future :)
>
>> Anyway, I can try your suggestion.
>
> I'm thinking have a guts block and putting a property in it makes the
> most sense.

After some discussion on IRC I think the following is the suggested  
node we should add in.

guts at e00000 {
	compatible = "fsl,mpc8548-guts";
	reg = <e00000 1000>;
	fsl,has-rstcr;
};

- k