Saving to 32 bits of GPRs in signal context
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Wed May 30 00:31:57 EST 2007
> > We don't need another ABI change to powerpc32 (still recovering
> from the
> > -msecure-plt ABI change) and WE DONT NEED a 3rd ABI.
> >
> > ABI changes ripple everywhere (not just GCC/GLIBC) including all
> debuggers
> > and performance tools. Believe me you really don't want this.
>
> Fully agreed. This may have gotten lost in the discussion thread, but
> what
> Ben originally proposed was *not* an ABI change, for exactly that
> reason.
> We simply want to allow strictly local use of 64-bit registers for
> performance optimization purposes, while still fully complying with
> the 32-bit ABI.
Some stuff gets added to the user version of the signal
frame; is that not an ABI change? Quite possibly a
(supposedly) compatible change, but a change anyway.
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list