[PATCH 5/5] PCI fixes for the MPC8641 Rev 2.0 silicon and Rev 1.02hardware

[Timur Tabi]

Scott Wood wrote:

> We also don't want people using a perfectly good device tree on a newer 
> revision of the board that just fixes things and doesn't make any 
> device-tree-relevant changes,

Well, either one device tree is okay, or we need two.  If we do need two, then it would be 
bad to load the wrong one on a particular board and have only 90% functionality.  If he 
have the ability to prevent customers from getting confused, then we should do that.  I 
wish this was standard behavior for all device trees.  I've frequently loaded the wrong 
device tree and wondered why nothing worked.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale