[PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

[Kumar Gala]

On May 2, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
>>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
>>>
>>>> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
>>>> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
>>>
>>> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
>>> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
>>> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.
>> Is this acceptable?   Just want to make sure before I ask Paul to  
>> pull some changes that touches the following drivers:
>> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c           |    2 +-
>> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c                  |   30 ++++----
>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c |    4 +-
>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |    4 +-
>
> I don't see a patch, just a diffstat.

I haven't sent a patch, just asking the question if I need to break  
it up or not.

- k