[Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Implement check_legacy_ioport() on PS3
Michael Ellerman
michael at ellerman.id.au
Fri Mar 30 11:43:20 EST 2007
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 20:45 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:02:52AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > It doesn't like it when we poke at legacy I/O ports like the i8042. We
> > should probably change the _default_ to return -ENODEV, and let any
> > strange platform which wants to allow unfettered access provide its own
> > function for that.
>
> I ran into the very same thing earlier myself and had exactly the same
> idea. However, it turned out then that it would have meant adding more
> cases of ioport being allowed than it would have removed the opposite. It
> might have changed since then. Either way it's annoying.
No I just looked at it too. We have 19 platforms, 7 define
check_legacy_ioport(), 6 of those return ENODEV, one does something
useful. Which leaves 12 platforms that get the default "return 0"
behaviour.
I still don't like it though, having to opt _out_ of random io port
poking is not nice.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20070330/f055c801/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list