[Fwd: [PATCH Resend 01/02] Add Linux ASMP support for MPC8641D]

[Segher Boessenkool]

> This is quite a special case. Having a brand new property for it might
> be a good idea. It's a pretty big hack anyway, so adding another one to
> the device tree isn't that big a deal.

Yes please.  If you must put this information in a
property in the mpic node (I'm not convinced you should,
but I haven't really looked at it either), please don't
overload the existing "interrupts" semantics -- just use
a different property name (and choose some descriptive
new name, not something too generic).


Segher