Fw: [PATCH 2/15] Automatically lmb_reserve() initrd
Stephen Winiecki
stevewin at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 14 04:43:00 EST 2007
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote on 03/12/2007
05:25:32 PM:
>
> > It might be helpful if some kind of message was surfaced if the
> > initrd-start/end properties didn't exist in the dt, esp. since it may
not
> > be well known initially as a dts definition requirement/option (voice
of
> > experience :)). In general I think surfacing messages for any
properties
> > which are detected as not existing and which might be normally
expected
> > would be a good thing as people get familiar with defining dts files
and
> > specifying properties for their platforms.
>
> Well.. initrd is totally optional...
>
I understand - I guess I am just thinking of the case where someone didn't
define the property because they were not aware of it - esp in this case
where the existence of the property name is all that is required for the
value to be filled in properly by the init code. Instead of just setting
the start/end to 0 - maybe include a message something like (even if
debug) "No initird-start/end property found - setting to 0" - just a minor
example. The larger point also being that defining dts files and
properties may be a new thing for many people with the new support - might
be helpful to surface missing properties when appropriate (I'm not
condoning mass amounts of messages for everything).
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list