[PATCH] ppc: Add support for bigger page sizes than 4KB on PPC44x
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Mar 14 00:54:27 EST 2007
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:37 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ben,
>
> in message <1173769934.24454.67.camel at localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> >
> > - It's arch/ppc. We shouldn't do new major features on this codebase.
> > You are welcome however in helping moving over 4xx to arch/powerpc :-)
>
> Will do that as soon as we have an arch/powerpc port for the 440SP /
> 440SPe
Ah great. I was thinking about working on 440GX after I'm back from the
ski. (I have a Taishan board)
We'll need to look into the MSI problem for SPe I suppose too...
hopefully Michael should have a proper MSI core merged upstream soom
(/me crosses fingers).
> > - Have you tried other page sizes ? How hard would it be to support 16K
> > and what kind of performance numbers do you get with 16K ? It's a better
>
> 16 kB should work, but was not tested so far. From our RAID oriented
> calculations it's not interesting.
Fair enough. I still think it would be useful for other workloads to
have that choice though :-)
> We tried 256 kB, but kernel linking fails with a "Not enough room for
> program headers" error message. We will investigate this ASAP, but at
> the moment we have other priorities. [Any hints what might go wrong
> are welcome.]
256K will not be doable without serious hacking afaik. Anything above
64K. You won't be able to run most userland apps for example as the
sections are generally 64K aligned.
> Agreed, but this obviously depends on the sort of application(s)
> you're running.
Definitely.
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list