[RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Jun 21 22:42:13 EST 2007
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>
> Is there a device binding defined somewhere for "chrp,iic"?
Yes, it's the standard for 8259 on chrp and chrp-like platforms.
> > interrupt-controller;
> > reg = <20 2 a0 2 4d0 2>;
> > reserved-interrupts = <2>;
I'm currious about the above though, what is it ?
> > #address-cells = <1>;
Why #address-cells set to 1 ? In a PIC node, in fact, I would expect it
to be 0 to avoid any spurrious "reg" matching for interrupts.
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > };
>
> > 8042 at 60 {
> > device_type = "8042";
> > compatible = "chrp,8042";
> > reg = <60 10>;
> > interrupts = <1 3 c 3>; // IRQ1, IRQ12
> (rising edge)
> > interrupt-parent = <&interrupt-controller>;
Just put the interrupt-parent pointer once in the isa bridge and all isa
devices below the bridge.
> This should cause a dtc error. Either you want &/interrupt-controller
> or give the interrupt-controller node a label and refer to that. It's
> either '&/some/full/path' or '&label'.
>
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>; // No physical
> address.
>
> Comment is arguably incorrect.
Yeah, not sure what that is supposed to be.
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list