[patch 00/13] CPU selection Kconfig cleanup, take 3

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Jun 18 00:46:01 EST 2007


On Jun 16, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Sunday 17 June 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> For the 'at least one option selected' argument, I'm not sure how
>>> important that is, IMHO it falls into the same category as any
>>> other essential option that you can disable.
>>
>> People have run into the issue so I think it desires at least a
>> little concern.  See: http://marc.info/?t=117529164800005&r=1&w=2
>
> But isn't the reported problem just a bug in the build system?
> My impression was that the user did not complain about the fact
> that the kernel he was trying to build would not boot on any
> platform, but rather that the kernel tried to build a zImage
> that was not defined, resulting in a build error.
>
> Obviously, any configuration that can be selected by the user
> should be able to compile and link without errors, even if it's
> not particularly useful.
>
> Aside from the multiplatform enabling patches, are you happy with
> the patches 1-8 from my fourth version of the patch set?

I commented on some minor nits with the patches.  I'm probably ok  
with patches 1-7 going in.  I'm not ready for 8 at this point, we  
need to do more proper cleanup to get 85xx/cpm2 support into a  
multiplatforms single kernel state.

- k



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list