[RFC][PATCH 6/8] Walnut DTS

[Yoder Stuart-B08248]

[snip]
> There is no child device node, but there are child interrupt 
> nodes, and
> since the interrupt-tree uses #address/size-cells, it does make some
> sense to specify them.
> 
> Yes, there is a default value when absent, but the simple 
> fact that the
> default is different depending if you are doing a device walk or an
> interrupt tree walk is very confusing. As I said above, the default
> values are a source of more problem than anything else and I tend to
> think they should be banned.
> 
> I would personally be inclined to define that whatever spec we come up
> with always require #address-cells/#size-cells for any node that can
> have either device children or interrupt children, and ban default
> values alltogether.

Did you really mean #size-cells here?  Shouldn't it be #interrupt-cells?

Stuart