[RFC][PATCH 3/8] 4xx MMU

Josh Boyer jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jul 12 22:40:24 EST 2007

On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 02:09 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Is it actually feasible to get to a point where
> > you can build a kernel that boots on both
> > 40x and 44x, or is it just too different?
> I'm guessing its too different since 40x probably has a real mode and  
> 44x doesnt.

Among other things.

> However, I agree we should go ahead and rename 4xx to 40x at this  
> point in arch/powerpc.

Yeah.  See my response to Arnd about getting a git tree in place to do
it.  RSN :)


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list