[PATCH] Infinite loop/always true check possible with unsigned counter.

[Paul Mackerras]

Andreas Schwab writes:

> >> ??? There is no rgn->cnt involved in the comparison.
> >
> > Look further down in lmb_add_region; there is a second for loop that
> > does
> >
> > 	for (i = rgn->cnt-1; i >= 0; i--)
> 
> Which is exactly the one quoted above.  I still don't see your point.

You're right - my mistake.

Paul.