82xx CPU features
g.liakhovetski at gmx.de
Wed Jan 31 09:31:46 EST 2007
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> For _CAN_NAP, I'm guessing its historic, maybe Dan knows why it wasn't set.
> What happens if you try to set it? Are there implications at the system level
> with regards to _CAN_NAP?
Just tested: set CPU_FTR_MAYBE_CAN_DOZE for 82xx, CONFIG_BDI_SWITCH is not
defined, echoed 1 to /proc/sys/kernel/powersave-nap - and a 8241 still
runs... I'll try to measure if there's any difference in power
> I'm looking at the CPU_FTR_PPC_LE it varies if we should use _PPC_LE vs
> _TRUE_LE (or whatever the other one is called).
More information about the Linuxppc-dev