EMAC OF binding....

[Kumar Gala]

On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 07:38 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>>  - compatible        : compatible list, contains 2 entries, first is
>>> "emac-CHIP" where
>>>                        CHIP is the host ASIC (440gx, 405gp, axon)  
>>> and
>>> second is either
>>>                        "emac" or "emac4".
>>>                        For axon, thus, we have: "emac-axon","emac4"
>>
>> "ibm,emac-axon" etc. please.
>
> What would you do for things like 440gx ? ibm,440gx or amcc,440gx ?

Does emac really vary that much between the chips its in?  I know  
chatting with Ben that axon did some evil things, but how much  
difference exists on 4xx implementations?

- k