[patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard
Zhu Ebony-r57400
ebony.zhu at freescale.com
Mon Jan 15 17:45:19 EST 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:segher at kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: 2007年1月12日 20:05
> To: Zhu Ebony-r57400
> Cc: Kumar Gala; paulus at samba.org; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully
> comply with IEEE-754 standard
>
> >> * Why isn't there any handling of SPEFloatingPointRound exceptions?
> >
> > I think the SPEFloatingPointRound exception is not
> necessary to handle
> > if we handle floating point exception this way.
>
> Some more explanation than "I don't think so" would be nice ;-)
>
Thanks for your reminder, I would like to correct what I said before.
FP round interrupt may be taken on some circumstance that FP
data interrupt doesn't take place, so we may still have to handle round
interrupt to fully comply IEEE-754. Do you think using the same way to
handle FP round interrupt as FP data interrupt is a reasonable approach?
Ebony
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list