[PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Feb 24 04:51:01 EST 2007
>>> If this is a one-off situation it doesn't warrant a new
>>> general property. However, if it becomes common enough
>>> a simpler representation will benefit developers.
>>
>> Sure. But in that case, it would be a lot better to
>> try to come up with something new that can handle the
>> general case (or many many more cases at least).
>
> What is the general case you are referring to here?
Anything else that currently needs an interrupt nexus
where there is no existing device node to put it in.
> What
> other cases and scenarios can you imagine?
Anything else that currently needs an interrupt nexus
where there is no existing device node to put it in.
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list