macros and dtc
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Tue Feb 20 10:29:07 EST 2007
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:04:44AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > I could envision using something like cpp with #include
> > to get some standard SOC block properties, but macros
> > that try to account for board variations could be quite
> > complex.
>
> For things like SoC, what I'd like is a way via #include or macros,
> whatever, to layout in a part of the tree a standard block, and then, be
> able to "overlay" on top of it.
Yes, certainly macros on their own wouldn't be very useful for SoCs or
standard boards. But macros plus overlays should be quite useful.
> I can see other uses for macros for things like making easier to build
> interrupt-map properties for example, especially since most embedded
> boards use standard swizzling
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list