Why do the rh_alloc functions return a pointer?
Timur Tabi
timur at freescale.com
Fri Feb 16 07:34:23 EST 2007
Sylvain Munaut wrote:
> I talked about it with Panto on IRC a few days ago.
>
> And he agrees that the function could be changed to user "unsigned long"
> instead of "void *".
Well, if there is a consensus that this should be changed, then I'll make the patch.
However, since the function prototype for all architectures is in
include/asm-ppc/rheap.h, I'll need to change powerpc and ppc in the same patch,
otherwise one of the two will break.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list