[PATCH 15/16] Add device tree for Ebony
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Feb 15 04:58:04 EST 2007
>> Did you mean to have UIC1 nested under UIC0 or should
>> they be at the same level?
>
> No, they are cascaded in hardware. I think having UIC1 under UCI0 is a
> correct representation.
Only the interrupt routing is cascaded AFAICS, and
there is a separate interrupt tree to express that.
>> Hmm. There are two "soc" devices here, one nested under the
>> first??
>>
>> I'm assuming these are two levels of busses the opb bus is attached
>> to the plb bus. Is the "soc" device_type the right way to
>> do this?
>
> Right, OPB hangs off of PLB in this case. I dunno if "soc" is the
> right
> device type for them though.
I would use device_type "plb" (or "plb4") and "opb" I think.
Similar to how PCI and ISA etc. busses are represented.
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list