[patch][0/5] powerpc V2 : Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard
Zhu Ebony-r57400
ebony.zhu at freescale.com
Fri Feb 9 16:15:12 EST 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak at kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:19 AM
> To: Zhu Ebony-r57400
> Cc: paulus at samba.org; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc V2 : Add support to fully
> comply with IEEE-754 standard
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Zhu Ebony-r57400 wrote:
>
> >>>>
> >>>> Did you end up getting testfloat running? I'd like to see some
> >>>> testing results before accepting these patches. I think
> >> testfloat is
> >>>> our best bet at this point.
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Kumar,
> >>>
> >>> I looked into the testfloat suit, and found all the
> instructions it
> >>> tests (more than 50)should be implemented based on ASM.
> >>
> >> Don't follow? Can't you build it with the e500 compiler?
> >>
> > The TestFloat suite provided the target of 386-Win32-gcc and
> > SPARC-Solaris-gcc only, and a template for user to porting his own
> > processor. Some general instructions are implemented in C, but some
> > CPU specific instructions like evfsmul need to be implemented
> > assemblely. To build it with e500 compiler we still Have
> some porting
> > work to do.
>
> I wouldn't worry too much about the vector forms. If the
> scalar single fp and double fp test out ok the vectors are
> pretty much similar enough.
>
> Lets just get the scalar versions tested and work out any
> issues there.
>
> - k
OK, I will focus on scalar SFPF and DPFP versions first.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list