[PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] Add pci node to sequoia dts

[Vitaly Bordug]

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:54:17 +1000
David Gibson wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 01:29:54PM +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vitb at kernel.crashing.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> >  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts
> > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts index ef6f41c..8eb258f 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts
> > @@ -92,6 +92,32 @@
> >  		#size-cells = <1>;
> >  		ranges;
> >  		clock-frequency = <0>; /* Filled in by zImage */
> > +		
> > +		pci {
> > +			/* irqs are routed to irq67, dependless of
> > devsel/PIRQx */
> > +			interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>;
> > +			interrupt-map = <0 0 0 0 &UIC2 3
> > 8>; +
> > +			interrupt-parent = <&UIC2>;
> > +			interrupts = <3 8>;
> > +	    
> > +			bus-range = <0 0>;
> > +	
> > +			/* 
> > +			 * mem is at 80000000 set up indirectly
> > +			 * io is at 0001_e800_0000
> > +			 */
> > +			ranges = <02000000 0 80000000 1 80000000 0
> > 10000000
> > +				01000000 0 00000000 1 e8000000 0
> > 00100000>; +
> > +			#interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <2>;
> > +			#address-cells = <3>;
> > +
> > +    			reg = <1 eec00000 40 1 ef400000
> > 40>;  /* phb cfg, phb reg */
> > +			compatible = "ibm, 440epx";
> > +			device_type = "pci";
> 
> I usually put device_type, compatible and reg at the top of the block,
> to announce what the node actually is before giving all the details.
> 
ok
> Also, apart from the stray space in the compatible, I'm guessing that
> the 440EPx bridge is actually more-or-less like the PCI bridges on
> other 4xx chips, so we should have a more general compatible string
> too.
> 
heh, with a sole PCI impl on 4xx it does not hurt to have more general
stuff here.
what is proposed, "amcc,4xx"?
> Is the 440EPx a vanilla PCI or a PCI-X bridge?  If the later that
> should be reflected in the name and compatible as well.
> 
"The 32-bit PCI bridge is compatible with he PCI Specification, Version
2.2 (it does not support 5V operation) "
so seems to be vanilla PCI.

> > +		};
> >  
> >  		SDRAM0: sdram {
> >  			device_type = "memory-controller";
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> > 
> 


-- 
Sincerely, Vitaly