[PATCH 0/5] Remove unnecessary loops_per_jiffy initialization code

[Jon Loeliger]

On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 15:47, Kumar Gala wrote:

> > Any reason why patches 1/5 and 2/5, for 86xx and 85xx respectively,
> > did not get applied and ushered upstream with the others?
> 
> No, I'm glad you said something cause I assumed paul grabbed them all.
> 
> I'll grab them in my tree once I beat paul into pulling the include  
> fixup changes.
> 
> - k

OK, sounds good.

Thanks,
jdl