[PATCH] [POWERPC] Fix interrupt routing and setup of ULI M1575 on FSL boards
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Aug 18 15:30:59 EST 2007
On Aug 17, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Kumar Gala writes:
>
>> Its a regression in that the ULI M1575 doesn't really work properly
>> on some of these boards in certain situations.
>
> Well, "it doesn't work" isn't of itself a regression, a regression is
> "it used to work and now it doesn't".
Interesting, maybe I was grouping both of these together as things
that could go in after the -rc1. I was under the impression that bug
fixes could also go in post -rc1.
> In any case the lateness x largeness product (LxL) of that patch is a
> bit too high. Is there a simpler way to fix it that doesn't involve
> moving all that code around?
I'm not really sure how to accomplish that. I could possibly
duplicate the 'fixes' in each board port but that seems pointless and
I doubt would reduce the code modifications amount any.
Most of this has to due with the kernel / firmware / device tree
interface. If we have a new firmware that modifies the memory map
and requires changes to the device tree and kernel is that a fix?
I understand the concern related to the LxL. I'd also say the set of
users this effects is very small since its just the two boards.
I leave it up to you if you want to grab this patch or not for
2.6.23. If not please pull all these into your for-2.6.24 branch.
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list