System crash on boot_e500.S

[mike zheng]

Unfortunately, all the applications are running on 2.4 kernel. I can not
just throw the 2.4 kernel. I took the some core specific code from
ppc.bkbits.net, such as head_e500.S and mpc85xx_cds_common.c. I assume the
image should work on the 8548 CDS board, or at least for the bootup. I shall
able to have the serial port working in platform_init(). However , the
code stops in the head_e500.S. This does not make any sense. Please correct
me if I am wrong.

BTW, I am using the tool-chain gcc-3_4-e5000glibc-2.3.4-dp, which is from
Freescale for the 8548 CDS BSP of 2.6 kernel.

Any suggest or comment is welcome, I am struggling with this issue for
almost one week...... :-(


On 8/15/07, Becky Bruce <becky.bruce at freescale.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:57:59AM -0400, mike zheng wrote:
> >>> Did you done similar work before? Current 2.6 code need many other
> >>> files,  I
> >>> have following errors when I try to use the head_e500.S from 2.6
> >>> code:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> /kernel->   powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc -m32 -Wp,-MD,arch/ppc/
> >>> kernel/.entry.o.d
> >>> -nostdinc -isystem /opt/mtwk/usr/local/gcc-3_4-
> >>> e500-glibc-2.3.4-dp/powerpc-linux-gnuspe/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-
> >>> gnuspe/3.4.3/include
> >>> -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude  -Iarch/ppc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -Iarch/ppc -Wa,-
> >>> me500     -c
> >>> -o arch/ppc/kernel/entry.o arch/ppc/kernel/entry.S
> >>> arch/ppc/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> >>>
> >>> entry.S:819: Error: unsupported relocation against CSRR0
> >>> entry.S:820: Error: unsupported relocation against CSRR1
> >>> entry.S:888: Error: unsupported relocation against MCSRR0
> >>> entry.S:889: Error: unsupported relocation against MCSRR1
> >>> entry.S:909: Error: unsupported relocation against CSRR0
> >>> entry.S:911: Error: unsupported relocation against CSRR1
> >>
> >> Try arch/powerpc; arch/ppc is deprecated.
> >
> > He's trying a 2.4 kernel.
>
> I think maybe he misunderstood Jon's advive to "use 2.6" as using
> just some files from 2.6.  I think the above is probably some strange
> mix of 2.4 and 2.6, which, of course, won't work.
>
> Jon's real advice was "use 2.6", as in, the whole thing.
>
> -B
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20070815/ed975f62/attachment.htm>