Device tree aware EMAC driver
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Wed Aug 8 15:09:37 EST 2007
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:16:43PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:22:31PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Based on BenH's earlier work, this is a new version of the EMAC driver
> > for the built-in ethernet found on PowerPC 4xx embedded CPUs. The
> > same ASIC is also found in the Axon bridge chip. This new version is
> > designed to work in the arch/powerpc tree, using the device tree to
> > probe the device, rather than the old and ugly arch/ppc OCP layer.
>
> <snip>
>
> Hi David,
> I had a look over the patch FWIW, asside from the points below
> looks good.
>
> Minor nits:
> * Shouldn't ndev->priv accesses, use netdev_priv() ? if not a comment
> somewhere about why not will keep the janators off your back.
netdev_priv() hey? Hadn't heard of that before. I guess
so... Changed.
> * c++ style comments
Eh, all the c++ comments are FIXMEs anyway. I'm inclined to leave
them.
> * in emac_probe():
> + /* Wait for dependent devices */
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + err = emac_wait_deps(dev);
> The initialisation to -ENODEV is pointless right?
Yes, I think so. Removed.
> * s/get_property/of_get_property/g or you'll make sfr grumpy ;P
Oops, yes.
> * In drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Makefile, I think the preferred method is
> to use ibm_newemac-y rather than ibm_newemac-objs.
>
> Is there any reason to leave config IBM_NEW_EMAC (and IBM_EMAC) in
> drivers/net/Kconfig ? It seems to me they'd be nicer to in the
> appropriate drivers/net/*Kconfig.
Yes, and that also seems to be how it's done for tulip. Moved.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list