[PATCH] [POWERPC] Fix section mismatch references to

[kou.ishizaki at toshiba.co.jp]

alloc_bootmem
In-Reply-To: <20070731171407.c1028de4.sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
From: Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki at toshiba.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2a9c4): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.__alloc_bootmem (between '.update_dn_pci_info' and
'.pci_dn_reconfig_notifier')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x36430): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.__alloc_bootmem (between '.mpic_msi_init_allocator' and
'.find_ht_magic_addr')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5e804): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.__alloc_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5e8e8): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.__alloc_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5e968): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.__alloc_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5ec50): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.free_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5ec70): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.free_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5eb88): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.free_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5eba8): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:.free_bootmem (between '.celleb_setup_phb' and
'.celleb_fake_pci_write_config')
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>


There is no problem in this patch for Celleb platform, and it looks
fine.

I have already posted another patch to remove warnings:
  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=12656
It will not conflict with this patch, and I hope both of them to be
applied.

Best regards,
Kou Ishizaki