[PATCH 2/5] bootwrapper: Add CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE

[Scott Wood]

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Hmmm, I'm not sure that I want to be asked about CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE on
> *all* powerpc platforms...  Surely this option should depend on
> something that says we're including support for a uBoot-able platform?

That's how I originally had it, but I was asked to make it more general. 
  One non-uboot usage is Mark Greer's "Add Makefile rule to wrap dts 
file in zImage" patch.

What about a CONFIG_WANT_DEVICE_TREE that platforms can select if they 
want to ask the user for a device tree?

-Scott