[PATCH v3] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers; optionally.
anemo at mba.ocn.ne.jp
Fri Apr 6 00:31:01 EST 2007
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:19:43 -0400, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG_TTYS
> +#define PMACZILOG_MAJOR TTY_MAJOR
> +#define PMACZILOG_MINOR 64
> +#define PMACZILOG_NAME "ttyS"
> +#define PMACZILOG_MAJOR 204
> +#define PMACZILOG_MINOR 192
> +#define PMACZILOG_NAME "ttyPZ"
Is major 204 minor 192 already allocated?
Few weeks ago, I sent a patch to allocate 192...199 for other serial
driver (Subject: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc3] serial: Allocate minor device
numbers for serial_txx9 driver):
And it is already in -mm tree since 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I just CC-ed the
patch to device at lanana.org, but I really do not know how "master"
devices.txt updated finally. If I should take some further action to
lanana.org or someone, please let me know. Thank you.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev