[PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.
paulus at samba.org
Wed Apr 4 15:53:50 EST 2007
David Woodhouse writes:
> Why? What's so special about the name 'ttyS'?
It's the name that users of Linux expect built-in serial ports to have.
> > The built-in ports can generally be enumerated early on boot in a
> > stable order, and they should be assigned the low ttySn numbers,
> > regardless of what chip is used to implement them.
> I don't see why that 'should' be the case. Certainly it _isn't_ the case
> on most supported platforms -- we have separate device numbers, and
> names, for most types of ports. There's only one or two drivers which
> abuse ttySn for anything other than 8250 ports.
It 'should' be the case because that is what is easiest for users and
makes most sense from a user's point of view.
You still haven't given any reason why a user should have to know or
care whether the built-in serial ports on his/her computer are
implemented with a 16C550 chip or a Z85C30 chip or something else.
Now, *maybe* the naming can be fixed up with udev. I haven't invested
the week of my life that it would take to investigate the twisty maze
of shell scripts that udev seems to involve.
In any case your patch is a user-visible incompatible API change and
will break existing working setups, so it should only be put in after
suitable warning has been given. Maybe we need a module parameter to
select between the old and new behaviour to ease the transition.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev