[PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Wed Apr 4 15:19:59 EST 2007

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 14:20 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I never suggested *all* serial ports should be /dev/ttySn, I said that
> the built-in ports on the motherboard should be /dev/ttySn. 

Why? What's so special about the name 'ttyS'?
> The built-in ports can generally be enumerated early on boot in a
> stable order, and they should be assigned the low ttySn numbers,
> regardless of what chip is used to implement them. 

I don't see why that 'should' be the case. Certainly it _isn't_ the case
on most supported platforms -- we have separate device numbers, and
names, for most types of ports. There's only one or two drivers which
abuse ttySn for anything other than 8250 ports.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list