[RFC][PATCH] QE device tree node definition

Li Tony-r64360 Tony.Li at freescale.com
Tue Sep 26 19:57:37 EST 2006


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li Yang-r58472 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: Li Tony-r64360; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] QE device tree node definition
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
> > 
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] 
> On Behalf 
> > Of Li Tony-r64360
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:40 AM
> > To: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> > Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] QE device tree node definition
> > 
> > 
> > 1) Where is the QE embedded interrupt controller ?
> > I think the interrupt-parent of the QE function should point to it.
> 
> QEIC is not necessarily to be defined specifically rather 
> than using generic interrupt controller spec.
> > 
> > 2) For the UCC, It is better to make rx-clock and tx-clock 
> as required 
> > properties.
> >  Almost all functions need this properties
> 
> Almost is NOT enough to make them required properties for all 
> UCC functions.  There are some devices uses TSA as clock source.

If using TSA, the xx-clock property can use some specific macro to
represent it.
All the UCC need a general clock whether from clocks or TSA. 

> 
> - Leo
> 



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list