[4/5] powerpc: PA Semi PWRficient platform support
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Sep 8 08:33:08 EST 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:28 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> How about I keep it this way until Maple is fixed then? It's
> >> better to keep it
> >> fairly common anyway. Functionally there's no difference.
> >
> > Well, the platform-open-pic thingy comes from the CHRP spec.
>
> I can't find it there. I'm looking at version 1.0; maybe it's
> in a newer version that I don't have? It's not in the PAPR
> either (the "open" version, anyway).
It's in the old RPAs
> > I'm no fan
> > of it but it looks like we do need it on pseries and I haven't
> > completely given up with having common mpic discovery routine...
>
> Sure. "Just look for the MPIC node and use it with one ISU" won't
> work on an actual Maple anyway afaics, it won't find the right
> base address for it in its device tree.
>
> I'll make something nice that maybe even you will like ;-)
>
> >>> Very nice, I'll convert maple to do the same (unless someone beats
> >>> me to it, heh).
> >>
> >> Maple isn't that different there. It just has to deal with
> >> multiple ISUs,
> >> while we currently only have one.
> >
> > Maple doesn't have multiple ISUs
>
> Exactly. All "real" OpenPICs don't; let's just recognise that fact.
>
>
> Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list