Is get_property() correct?

Michael Ellerman michael at ellerman.id.au
Sat Oct 28 19:08:23 EST 2006


On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 01:38 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/28/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 00:41 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > Well considering that we don't know the type of the property value, the
> > best we can do is return a pointer to it ...
> >
> > The comment might want an update, though it never stroke me as confusing
> > but heh :)
> 
> No, it's not confusing.  Both the comment and the code are correct.  I
> just forgot how to read code.  :(

But at least now we're all _sure_ they're correct, some good still
done :)

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20061028/08df8723/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list