[1/2] build failure for E500 CPUs w/ CONFIG_OPROFLE=y
sshtylyov at ru.mvista.com
Fri Oct 27 06:32:06 EST 2006
Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hello Kumar,
>>This makes sense to me since we are just increasing kernel code size
>>for code we would never use for an FSL_BOOKE part if we do it the
>>other way. I dont think its that much more messy with the ifdef's.
> Okay, if you're fine with this patch, is it possible that you include it
> into your tree?
>>If you want to do the other cleanup as well I've got no issue with
>>that, but we really should NOT build in support for 7450 into a
>>FSL_BOOKE kernel when reasonably avoidable.
> That's fine with me.
> As of the cleanups, well... looks to me some more patches will follow
> soon, kinda bugfixing ones rather than cleanups first :)
The most funny/stupd thing is that the patch existed since May but it never
More information about the Linuxppc-dev