[PATCH] powerpc: Cell timebase bug workaround
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Oct 9 17:05:17 EST 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 16:56 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:10:22 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > Index: linux-work/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-work.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S 2006-10-06 13:47:54.000000000 +1000
> > +++ linux-work/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S 2006-10-09 13:28:54.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> > * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> > * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/config.h>
>
> You don't need that (in fact someone just remoed them all).
Oops, leftover of a previous patch. I'll remove it.
> > #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > -#define BEGIN_FTR_SECTION 98:
> > +#define BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(label) label:
> > +#define BEGIN_FTR_SECTION BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(98)
> >
> > #ifndef __powerpc64__
> > -#define END_FTR_SECTION(msk, val) \
> > +#define END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(msk, val, label) \
> > 99: \
> > .section __ftr_fixup,"a"; \
> > .align 2; \
> > .long msk; \
> > .long val; \
> > - .long 98b; \
> > + .long label##b; \
> > .long 99b; \
> > .previous
> > #else /* __powerpc64__ */
> > -#define END_FTR_SECTION(msk, val) \
> > +#define END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(msk, val, label) \
> > 99: \
> > .section __ftr_fixup,"a"; \
> > .align 3; \
> > .llong msk; \
> > .llong val; \
> > - .llong 98b; \
> > + .llong label##b; \
> > .llong 99b; \
> > .previous
> > #endif /* __powerpc64__ */
> >
> > +#define END_FTR_SECTION(msk, val) \
> > + END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(msk, val, 98)
> > +
>
> The above should be in a separate patch.
Hrm... makes my life more complicated but I suppose I can split it.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_CELL
> > +#define MFTB(dest) \
> > + mftb dest; \
> > +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION; \
> > + cmpwi dest,0; \
> > + bne+ 97f; \
> > + mftb dest; \
> > +97: \
> > +END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_CELL_TB_BUG)
>
> Why not branch back to the mftb if the lower word is zero (this would
> also take care of the very unlikely "hitting the bug more than once" case
> and the "normal" case would then not have to branch at all. (And it uses
> one less instruction.)
Because that would cause us to spinloop for the whole duration of a tb
tick in that case, which is pretty bad when the timebase is slow (the
slower I've seen so far is 14Mhz).
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list