[PATCH] Update MTFSF_L() comment

Anton Blanchard anton at samba.org
Fri Oct 6 02:54:07 EST 2006


David Woodhouse points out that the comment accompanying the MTFSF_L
macro is misleading. We should make it clear that the L bit is ignored
on older CPUS, not the entire instruction.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org>
---

diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
index 3a9fcc1..8fb9681 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ #endif
 
 /*
  * An mtfsf instruction with the L bit set. On CPUs that support this a
- * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs it is ignored.
+ * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs the L bit is ignored.
  *
  * Until binutils gets the new form of mtfsf, hardwire the instruction.
  */



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list