Please pull upstream branch of linux-2.6-PQ.git...
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Oct 4 05:14:53 EST 2006
On Oct 3, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:43:35 -0500
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>>> Please do a pull from
>>> PQ.git, upstream branch.
>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug at ru.mvista.com>
>>> To receive the updated 8272 addition to the arch/powerpc.
>>> All the comments have been addressed, and it has a minor bugfix
>>> addressed too in order to make both pq2 and pq3
>>> co-exist happily in fsl_soc.c. CPM PIC now has "compatible"
>>> property that could be "CPM2" or "CPM1" for PQ/8xx.
>>> I think it should go to rc1, because relevant stuff in ppc/ is
>>> more or less broken now, with new irq engine.
>>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts | 223 ++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Kconfig | 21
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Makefile | 5
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/m82xx_pci.h | 19
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx.c | 111 +++++
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx_ads.c | 661
>>> ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/pq2ads.h | 67 +++
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c | 2
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.h | 2
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c | 62 ++
>>> 11 files changed, 1165 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> Are there updates to the flat dev spec for the CPM nodes? That is
>> my only hold up on ack'ing all this good PQ2/PQ3 CPM work.
> It is coming along with QE docs, on top of it, since we decided to
> make CPM a "sibliing".
> I'll follow-up with the stuff in the separate domain if we've no
> chance to get QE thing in this time.
> Though, tha't not what will be good, because we should keep clear,
> how similar are CPM and QE.
> Again, most of the node things are self-explanatory and assuming
> ppc/ entity of 8272 does not
> function properly anymore, I really want this in rc1. There are
> many boards like it, so this will encourage people
> to move to the powerpc which with a reference much more simple than
> fix ppc/ irq stuff.
> So, as a recap physically spec is ready, just depending on QE spec
> that is floating around still :)
> And, having 85xx cpm2 stuff in the Linus' mainline atm, there's no
> much reason holding this, is there ;) ?
I agree. How about posting the lastest cpm2 spec to the list.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev