Please pull upstream branch of linux-2.6-PQ.git...

[Kumar Gala]

On Oct 3, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:43:35 -0500
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> Please do a pull from
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6-
>>> PQ.git, upstream branch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug at ru.mvista.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> To receive the updated 8272 addition to the  arch/powerpc.
>>> All the comments have been addressed, and it has a minor bugfix
>>> addressed too in order to make both pq2 and pq3
>>> co-exist happily in fsl_soc.c. CPM PIC now has "compatible"
>>> property that could be "CPM2" or "CPM1" for PQ/8xx.
>>>
>>> I think it should go to rc1, because relevant stuff in ppc/ is
>>> more or less broken now, with new irq engine.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig                      |    1
>>>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts      |  223 ++++++++++
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Kconfig       |   21
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Makefile      |    5
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/m82xx_pci.h   |   19
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx.c     |  111 +++++
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx_ads.c |  661
>>> ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++
>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/pq2ads.h      |   67 +++
>>>  arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c            |    2
>>>  arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.h            |    2
>>>  arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c             |   62 ++
>>>  11 files changed, 1165 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> Are there updates to the flat dev spec for the CPM nodes?  That is
>> my only hold up on ack'ing all this good PQ2/PQ3 CPM work.
>>
>
> It is coming along with QE docs, on top of it, since we decided to  
> make CPM a "sibliing".
> I'll follow-up with the stuff in the separate domain if we've no  
> chance to get QE thing in this time.
> Though, tha't not what will be good, because we should keep clear,  
> how similar are CPM and QE.
>
> Again, most of the node things are self-explanatory and assuming  
> ppc/ entity of 8272 does not
> function properly anymore, I really want this in rc1. There are  
> many boards like it, so this will encourage people
> to move to the powerpc which with a reference much more simple than  
> fix ppc/ irq stuff.
>
> So, as a recap physically spec is ready, just depending on QE spec  
> that is floating around still :)
> And, having 85xx cpm2 stuff in the Linus' mainline atm, there's no  
> much reason holding this, is there ;) ?

I agree. How about posting the lastest cpm2 spec to the list.

- k