ipr SATA support is causing problems
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Sun Nov 12 11:50:41 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 17:56 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > How hard would it be to make the SATA bits conditionally compiled in,
> > depending on CONFIG_ATA?
>
> I took a look at doing this. It got a bit messy with a bunch of ifdefs,
> then I realized that doing this would break module dependencies. If
> ipr does not depend on CONFIG_ATA, then libata will not automatically
> get loaded (or built into initrd's) when ipr is needed.
>
> The best way I can see to accomplish your desired goal is to do something
> like the fusion driver did and separate out the sas bits from the scsi
> bits and essentially end up with multiple ipr modules. Unfortunately,
> this is not 2.6.19 material, but I could start working on it if you
> thought it sounded like a reasonable direction.
Yeah, something like
/--- SATA sub-modules (depends on CONFIG_ATA)
- core IPR module /
\
\--- SAS sub-module (depends on CONFIG_SCSI)
\
\--- SCSI sub-module (depends on CONFIG_SCSI)
Or do you need SAS and SATA to be one and only one ?
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list