[PATCH] powerpc: force 4k update_flash block and list sizes
John Rose
johnrose at austin.ibm.com
Wed Nov 8 15:30:02 EST 2006
> kmem_cache_destroy doesn't return anything.
Good call! How's this:
The enablement of 64k pages on POWER platforms exposed a quirk in the RTAS
mechanism for updating firmware. RTAS assumes 4k for flash block and list
sizes, and use of any other sizes results in a failure.
This patch changes the rtas_flash module to force the use of 4k memory block
and list sizes when preparing and sending a firmware image to RTAS. It also
changes rtas_flash to use a slab cache to ensure 4k alignment of flash block
data. Such alignment is a documented requirement.
Signed-off-by: John Rose <johnrose at austin.ibm.com>
---
---
uf_4k-johnrose/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c~uf_4k_alt2 arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c
--- uf_4k/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c~uf_4k_alt2 2006-11-06 16:59:27.000000000 -0600
+++ uf_4k-johnrose/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c 2006-11-06 17:02:31.000000000 -0600
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
#define VALIDATE_BUF_SIZE 4096
#define RTAS_MSG_MAXLEN 64
+/* Quirk - RTAS requires 4k list length and block size */
+#define RTAS_BLKLIST_LENGTH 4096
+#define RTAS_BLK_SIZE 4096
+
struct flash_block {
char *data;
unsigned long length;
@@ -83,7 +87,7 @@ struct flash_block {
* into a version/length and translate the pointers
* to absolute.
*/
-#define FLASH_BLOCKS_PER_NODE ((PAGE_SIZE - 16) / sizeof(struct flash_block))
+#define FLASH_BLOCKS_PER_NODE ((RTAS_BLKLIST_LENGTH - 16) / sizeof(struct flash_block))
struct flash_block_list {
unsigned long num_blocks;
struct flash_block_list *next;
@@ -96,6 +100,9 @@ struct flash_block_list_header { /* just
static struct flash_block_list_header rtas_firmware_flash_list = {0, NULL};
+/* Use slab cache to guarantee 4k alignment */
+static kmem_cache_t *flash_block_cache = NULL;
+
#define FLASH_BLOCK_LIST_VERSION (1UL)
/* Local copy of the flash block list.
@@ -153,7 +160,7 @@ static int flash_list_valid(struct flash
return FLASH_IMG_NULL_DATA;
}
block_size = f->blocks[i].length;
- if (block_size <= 0 || block_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
+ if (block_size <= 0 || block_size > RTAS_BLK_SIZE) {
return FLASH_IMG_BAD_LEN;
}
image_size += block_size;
@@ -177,9 +184,9 @@ static void free_flash_list(struct flash
while (f) {
for (i = 0; i < f->num_blocks; i++)
- free_page((unsigned long)(f->blocks[i].data));
+ kmem_cache_free(flash_block_cache, f->blocks[i].data);
next = f->next;
- free_page((unsigned long)f);
+ kmem_cache_free(flash_block_cache, f);
f = next;
}
}
@@ -278,6 +285,12 @@ static ssize_t rtas_flash_read(struct fi
return msglen;
}
+/* constructor for flash_block_cache */
+void rtas_block_ctor(void *ptr, kmem_cache_t *cache, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ memset(ptr, 0, RTAS_BLK_SIZE);
+}
+
/* We could be much more efficient here. But to keep this function
* simple we allocate a page to the block list no matter how small the
* count is. If the system is low on memory it will be just as well
@@ -302,7 +315,7 @@ static ssize_t rtas_flash_write(struct f
* proc file
*/
if (uf->flist == NULL) {
- uf->flist = (struct flash_block_list *) get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ uf->flist = kmem_cache_alloc(flash_block_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!uf->flist)
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -313,21 +326,21 @@ static ssize_t rtas_flash_write(struct f
next_free = fl->num_blocks;
if (next_free == FLASH_BLOCKS_PER_NODE) {
/* Need to allocate another block_list */
- fl->next = (struct flash_block_list *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ fl->next = kmem_cache_alloc(flash_block_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fl->next)
return -ENOMEM;
fl = fl->next;
next_free = 0;
}
- if (count > PAGE_SIZE)
- count = PAGE_SIZE;
- p = (char *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (count > RTAS_BLK_SIZE)
+ count = RTAS_BLK_SIZE;
+ p = kmem_cache_alloc(flash_block_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
if(copy_from_user(p, buffer, count)) {
- free_page((unsigned long)p);
+ kmem_cache_free(flash_block_cache, p);
return -EFAULT;
}
fl->blocks[next_free].data = p;
@@ -791,6 +804,16 @@ int __init rtas_flash_init(void)
goto cleanup;
rtas_flash_term_hook = rtas_flash_firmware;
+
+ flash_block_cache = kmem_cache_create("rtas_flash_cache",
+ RTAS_BLK_SIZE, RTAS_BLK_SIZE, 0,
+ rtas_block_ctor, NULL);
+ if (!flash_block_cache) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to create block cache\n",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
return 0;
cleanup:
@@ -804,7 +827,16 @@ cleanup:
void __exit rtas_flash_cleanup(void)
{
+ int rc;
+
rtas_flash_term_hook = NULL;
+
+ if (flash_block_cache) {
+ rc = kmem_cache_destroy(flash_block_cache);
+ if (rc)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: cache memory leak\n",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ }
remove_flash_pde(firmware_flash_pde);
remove_flash_pde(firmware_update_pde);
remove_flash_pde(validate_pde);
_
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list