fixup_bigphys_addr and ioremap64 question
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Nov 6 14:17:25 EST 2006
While merging io.h between 32 and 64 bits arch/powerpc, I stumbled upon
this little gem :-)
So we have these:
- If CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is not set, nothing special. phys_addr_t is
defined to be 32 bits.
- If it is set however, we have phys_addr_t defined to be 64 bits in
asm-ppc/mmu.h.
So why do we have both ioremap and ioremap64 knowing that the former is
defined to take a phys_addr_t argument ?
Currently, we have both, with the only difference being that ioremap
calls ioremap64 but also passes the argument through a
fixup_bigphys_addr() function first.
It took me a while to find it ... it's not defined in generic code but
in platform code (ugh !). In fact, the only version of it we have in
arch/powerpc is in the 85xx support and does:
phys_addr_t fixup_bigphys_addr(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size)
{
return addr;
};
So here's my question: Is it, as I think, some old mecanism that was
useful when ioremap didn't take a phys_addr_t argument and resources
didn't have 64 bits fields and thus we had a way to "remap" IOs from a
32 bits space into a 64 bits space in a platform specific way ?
Now, the big question is: do we still need that ?
If, as I expect, the answer is no, then I'll just remove it. I'll also
remove ioremap64 from arch/powerpc since ioremap can take a 64 bits
value directly.
Now, if the answer is yes, then I'll turn it into a ppc_md. call since
it its current form, it's just broken.
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list