[RFC-PATCH] Prevent tasks from sleeping in die()
David Wilder
dwilder at us.ibm.com
Thu May 11 10:19:34 EST 2006
I am seeing an issue in die() when voluntary preemption is enabled.
die()
->>show_regs()->>show_instructions()->>__get_user_nocheck()->>might_sleep()
If multiple CPUs call die() and one should sleep other CPUs may block on
the die_lock held by the sleeping CPU. This problem is seen when a
soft-reset is issued as all CPUs call die() at roughly the same time.
Is this the correct way to fix this problem?
Signed-of-by: <wilder at us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 064a525..dc45bcd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -101,6 +101,15 @@ int die(const char *str, struct pt_regs
if (debugger(regs))
return 1;
+ /* If voluntary preemption is on we can sleep
+ * in show_regs(). This is bad as we hold the
+ * die_lock. Ether the task is exiting or the system
+ * is crashing so there is no need to restore the
+ * NEED_RESCHED flag.
+ */
+ clear_need_resched();
+
+
console_verbose();
spin_lock_irq(&die_lock);
bust_spinlocks(1);
--
David Wilder
IBM Linux Technology Center
Beaverton, Oregon, USA
dwilder at us.ibm.com
(503)578-3789
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list