windfarm for PM72/PM73/RM31

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

> 1. Message naming consistancy - there are a number of printk/DBG
> statements that seem to flip randomly between using a prefix of
> 'windfarm:' or 'wf:', and then some that omit it entirely.
> Any consensus on which one is preferred?

Not really... I tended to use "wf" for debug and "windfarm" for normally
visible messages but I may not have been totally consistent.

> 2. Could somebody please send me a tarball of /proc/device-tree/ from a
> RackMac3,1 unit? I've got the data for PM72/73 already.

I'll do so tomorrow, ping me if you don't hear from me.

Ben.