[PATCH] possible scheduler deadlock in 2.6.16
Ingo Molnar
mingo at elte.hu
Thu Mar 23 00:16:46 EST 2006
* Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org> wrote:
> One way to solve this is to always take runqueues in cpu id order. To
> do this we add a cpu variable to the runqueue and check it in the
> double runqueue locking functions.
>
> Thoughts?
it's fine with me - the overhead to double_rq_lock() is minimal, and
it's not critical code either.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu>
Ingo
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list