[PATCH 2/7] powerpc numa: Minor debugging code changes
haveblue at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 22 05:27:11 EST 2006
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 18:34 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Don't print a meaningless associativity depth (-1) on non-numa systems.
> - dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", min_common_depth);
> if (min_common_depth < 0)
> return min_common_depth;
> + dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", min_common_depth);
This is debugging code anyway, right?
I thought this might be useful when you're booting on a machine which
you _think_ should be NUMA, but doesn't come up that way. Did you boot
a non-NUMA kernel, or is something in the reporting wrong? It makes it
pretty obvious when you see this printout.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev